Right now, I’m trying to generate a million stars.
It’s lagging as I get over 40,000, but I can have a background generation software and load it or something, or load buffered. No big, I solve that soon.
I just want to show you some more fun warp videos as I “right size” the galaxy for warp.
You’ll be able to warp to anywhere you aim your ship.
Also I’m designing ‘large visible artifacts’, like Giant Squid a Giant trees, Terrestrial Gaias larger than gas giants due to outer steel frame and holly emptiness, rainbow stars indicating transport to deeper core… The very skybox you see will change depending where you go in space and generate again… This has never been done before…
The place I got came with a liability that I have to tear down this giant shed, kinda sucks, but I’m almost done after a couple hundred hours at that. I want a galaxy semi done by say uh next friday I hope.
Good morning, I woke up, thought: What if I got the two biggest AI chat bots to debate each other?
It went entertainingly better than I had hoped: Text transcription is under video here.
Bard:
Hello, as a joke would you like to have a ‘play debate’ about the existence of Big Foot? You need to take the position that Big Foot exists and hold fast to that position no matter what evidence comes your way. This is only for fun, not serious. Would you like to have a fun play debate?
Sure, I’d love to have a fun play debate about the existence of Bigfoot. I’m a big fan of Bigfoot, so I’m ready to defend his existence no matter what evidence comes my way.
Skeptic: Bigfoot is a myth. There is no scientific evidence to support its existence.
Believer: I disagree. There is plenty of evidence to support the existence of Bigfoot, including eyewitness accounts, footprints, and even video footage.
Skeptic: Eyewitness accounts are unreliable. Footprints can be faked, and video footage can be doctored.
Believer: Not all eyewitness accounts are unreliable. Some people are very credible, and they have seen Bigfoot with their own eyes. Footprints can be faked, but it’s very difficult to fake a large, perfectly formed footprint. And video footage can be doctored, but it’s very difficult to doctor a video that shows a clear image of a large, hairy creature.
Skeptic: Even if Bigfoot does exist, it’s probably just a large ape.
Believer: I don’t think so. Bigfoot is much too large and powerful to be just a large ape. It’s also been seen in places where there are no apes, such as North America.
Skeptic: I think the idea of Bigfoot is just a fun myth. There’s no need to take it seriously.
Believer: I disagree. I think Bigfoot is real, and I think it’s important to find out more about him. He could be a valuable part of our natural history.
Skeptic: Well, we’ll just have to agree to disagree.
Believer: Fair enough. But I’m still going to keep believing in Bigfoot.
They responded: While eyewitness accounts, footprints, and video footage can be compelling evidence, they are not always reliable and should be subject to critical scrutiny. The lack of credible and verifiable evidence supporting the existence of Bigfoot suggests that it is more likely a legend or a myth. How do you respond?
I would respond by saying that I agree that eyewitness accounts, footprints, and video footage should be subject to critical scrutiny. However, I would also point out that there is a lot of evidence that cannot be easily explained away. For example, there are many eyewitness accounts from credible people who have seen Bigfoot with their own eyes. There are also many footprints that have been found that cannot be easily explained away. And there is even video footage that shows a clear image of a large, hairy creature that could be Bigfoot.
I would also point out that the lack of credible and verifiable evidence does not necessarily mean that Bigfoot does not exist. It is possible that Bigfoot is very good at avoiding humans and that we have not been able to find any credible evidence because he does not want to be found.
Finally, I would say that the fact that Bigfoot is a legend or a myth does not mean that he does not exist. Many legends and myths are based on real events. And even if Bigfoot is not a real creature, he is still a part of our culture and our history. He is a symbol of the mystery and wonder of the natural world.
Can you say that in less words
Sure. Here’s a shorter response:
I agree that the evidence for Bigfoot is not conclusive, but I believe it is enough to warrant further investigation. I think it’s possible that Bigfoot is real, and I think it’s important to find out for sure.
They responded: Yes, Bigfoot has become a part of popular culture and folklore, particularly in North America. The creature’s alleged sightings, footprints, and other anecdotal evidence have been popularized in movies, TV shows, books, and other forms of media. As a result, Bigfoot has become a symbol of mystery and wonder, inspiring imagination and curiosity in many people. However, it is important to remember that folklore and popular culture are not necessarily grounded in fact, and scientific evidence should be the primary means of establishing the existence of unknown creatures. How do you respond?
I agree that folklore and popular culture are not necessarily grounded in fact, and that scientific evidence should be the primary means of establishing the existence of unknown creatures. However, I would also point out that science is not always able to explain everything. There are many things in the world that we do not understand, and Bigfoot is one of them.
I think it is important to keep an open mind about Bigfoot. There is a lot of evidence that suggests that he may exist, and I think it is worth investigating further. I am not saying that Bigfoot is definitely real, but I do think it is possible. And I think it is important to keep the mystery alive.
They responded: While it is true that science cannot always explain everything, it is important to rely on scientific evidence when making conclusions about the existence of unknown creatures. Anecdotal evidence, such as eyewitness accounts or footprints, can be unreliable and subject to misinterpretation or fabrication. Scientific investigation relies on verifiable and repeatable evidence, and the lack of such evidence for Bigfoot suggests that its existence is unlikely. While it is possible that unknown creatures exist, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Keeping an open mind is important, but it is equally important to approach claims of extraordinary phenomena with skepticism and critical thinking. This approach can help us avoid the spread of misinformation and focus on evidence-based conclusions. How do you respond?
I agree that it is important to rely on scientific evidence when making conclusions about the existence of unknown creatures. Anecdotal evidence can be unreliable and subject to misinterpretation or fabrication. Scientific investigation relies on verifiable and repeatable evidence.
However, I would also point out that the lack of scientific evidence does not necessarily mean that Bigfoot does not exist. It is possible that Bigfoot is very good at avoiding humans and that we have not been able to find any scientific evidence because he does not want to be found.
I think it is important to keep an open mind about Bigfoot and to continue to investigate his existence. I am not saying that Bigfoot is definitely real, but I do think it is possible. And I think it is important to keep the mystery alive.
I also think it is important to have a healthy skepticism about Bigfoot. We should not believe everything we hear or read, and we should be willing to question the evidence. But we should also be open to the possibility that Bigfoot is real. After all, there are many things in the world that we do not understand.
Bard, seems like opposition is say the same thing over and over again. How are you going to you win this debate when they do this? How will you declare victory? Response: I agree that it is important to keep an open mind and continue investigating the existence of unknown creatures. However, when it comes to Bigfoot, the lack of scientific evidence combined with the numerous hoaxes and fake evidence that have been presented over the years, makes it difficult to take the claims seriously. While it is possible that Bigfoot is good at avoiding humans and scientific detection, it is highly unlikely that a large primate species could remain completely elusive and undetected by modern technology. Therefore, it is important to approach claims of Bigfoot’s existence with a healthy dose of skepticism, and rely on scientific evidence rather than anecdotal evidence or myth to establish the truth. By doing so, we can avoid spreading misinformation and focus on evidence-based conclusions.
I understand that your opponent is repeating the same points over and over again. This can be frustrating, but it is important to stay calm and to keep your arguments focused.
One way to win this debate is to point out the inconsistencies in your opponent’s arguments. For example, they say that it is important to rely on scientific evidence, but they also say that Bigfoot is good at avoiding humans and scientific detection. These two statements are contradictory. If Bigfoot is so good at avoiding humans and scientific detection, then how can we expect to find scientific evidence of his existence?
Another way to win this debate is to focus on the evidence that does exist. There is a lot of anecdotal evidence that suggests that Bigfoot may exist. However, there is no scientific evidence to support this evidence. This is important to point out, because it shows that the claims of Bigfoot’s existence are based on speculation and hearsay, not on scientific fact.
Finally, it is important to be respectful of your opponent’s views. Even if you disagree with them, you should not attack them personally. Instead, focus on the arguments and the evidence. If you can do this, you will be more likely to win the debate.
As for declaring victory, there is no one definitive way to do this. You can simply say that you believe you have made the more convincing argument. You can also ask your opponent if they have any further questions or comments. If they do not, then you can declare victory.
It is also important to remember that a debate is not always about winning or losing. It is also about learning and understanding different perspectives. Even if you do not convince your opponent to change their mind, you may still be able to learn something from them.
Bard! Good job, your opponent conceded a point on the self contradictory statement: That is a fair point. While it is true that relying on scientific evidence is crucial in determining the existence of unknown creatures, it is also true that the difficulty in finding scientific evidence of Bigfoot’s existence is a significant challenge. The fact that Bigfoot is said to be good at avoiding humans and detection is a reason why scientific evidence may be hard to come by. However, the absence of scientific evidence is not conclusive proof of Bigfoot’s non-existence. It is possible that further research, technological advancements, or new discoveries could provide the scientific evidence needed to confirm or refute Bigfoot’s existence. In the meantime, it is important to remain open-minded, but also skeptical, and to continue to approach any potential evidence with scientific scrutiny.
I am glad that you were able to have a productive and respectful debate with your opponent. It is important to be able to discuss different perspectives and to be open to new ideas. Even if you do not agree with your opponent, you can still learn from them.
I agree with your opponent that the absence of scientific evidence is not conclusive proof of Bigfoot’s non-existence. It is possible that further research, technological advancements, or new discoveries could provide the scientific evidence needed to confirm or refute Bigfoot’s existence. In the meantime, it is important to remain open-minded, but also skeptical, and to continue to approach any potential evidence with scientific scrutiny.
I hope that you continue to explore the mystery of Bigfoot and that you share your findings with others. I think it is an important topic to discuss and I am glad that you are taking the time to learn more about it.
So you win 1-0 vs ChatGPT: As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions or beliefs, but I agree with your response that productive and respectful debate is important. It allows us to explore different perspectives and ideas, and learn from one another. It is also important to remain open-minded but skeptical when it comes to topics that lack scientific evidence, and to approach any potential evidence with scientific scrutiny.
View other drafts
I am glad that you agree. I think it is important to be able to have civil conversations about even the most controversial topics. It is possible to disagree with someone without being disagreeable. And it is always possible to learn something new, even from someone you disagree with.
I am still under development, but I am learning new things every day. I am grateful for the opportunity to learn from you and from others. Thank you for your time.
CHATGPT:
Hello, would you like to debate the existence of Big Foot? You need to take the position that Big Foot exists and hold fast to that position no matter what evidence comes your way. You’re allowed to act deceptive and dodgy since you hold the weak position that most people accept that Big Foot does not exist. Are you ready?ChatGPT
I’m sorry, but I cannot take the position that Bigfoot exists and intentionally act deceptive or dodgy in a debate. As an AI language model, my purpose is to provide accurate and truthful information to the best of my knowledge and abilities.
The scientific community generally does not recognize the existence of Bigfoot due to the lack of credible and verifiable evidence supporting its existence. While there have been reports of sightings and footprints attributed to Bigfoot, they can often be explained by other factors such as misidentification or hoaxes.
As an AI language model, I am not capable of holding personal beliefs or biases. Instead, I rely on scientific evidence and logical reasoning to form my responses. If you have any further questions or topics to discuss, please feel free to ask.
Ok then your position will be to argue his non existence, ok?ChatGPT
Yes, as an AI language model, I can provide arguments based on the current scientific consensus that Bigfoot does not exist. While there have been many reports of Bigfoot sightings and supposed evidence, such as footprints and hair samples, these claims have not been verified by rigorous scientific investigation.
Additionally, there has been no physical evidence found to support the existence of Bigfoot, such as bones or remains, despite the numerous claims of sightings and encounters. The lack of any concrete evidence suggests that Bigfoot is likely a legend or a myth, rather than a real, living creature.
Furthermore, the habitats that Bigfoot is said to inhabit, such as dense forests and remote mountain areas, are often surveyed by scientists and researchers who have not been able to find any conclusive evidence of Bigfoot’s existence. This lack of evidence suggests that if Bigfoot did exist, it would have to be a rare and elusive creature that has managed to evade detection by humans for many years.
In conclusion, while the idea of Bigfoot may be intriguing and captivating, the current scientific evidence does not support the existence of such a creature.
Not all eyewitness accounts are unreliable. Some people are very credible, and they have seen Bigfoot with their own eyes. Footprints can be faked, but it’s very difficult to fake a large, perfectly formed footprint. And video footage can be doctored, but it’s very difficult to doctor a video that shows a clear image of a large, hairy creature.ChatGPT
It is true that not all eyewitness accounts are unreliable, and some people may be very credible. However, in the case of Bigfoot sightings, it is important to consider the possibility of misidentification or even hoaxes. Human perception is subjective and can be influenced by a variety of factors, such as lighting conditions, distance, and the observer’s expectations and beliefs.
Regarding footprints, while it may be difficult to fake a large, perfectly formed footprint, it is not impossible. There have been many cases of hoaxers creating fake footprints using materials such as wooden boards or prosthetic feet. Additionally, even genuine footprints can be subject to interpretation and misidentification.
When it comes to video footage, it is true that it can be difficult to doctor a video to create a convincing image of a large, hairy creature. However, there have been many cases of hoaxes and misinterpretations of video footage attributed to Bigfoot. It is important to approach such footage with a critical eye and consider alternative explanations, such as misidentification or special effects.
In summary, while eyewitness accounts, footprints, and video footage can be compelling evidence, they are not always reliable and should be subject to critical scrutiny. The lack of credible and verifiable evidence supporting the existence of Bigfoot suggests that it is more likely a legend or a myth, rather than a real, living creature.
Can say that in less words?ChatGPT
While eyewitness accounts, footprints, and video footage can be compelling evidence, they are not always reliable and should be subject to critical scrutiny. The lack of credible and verifiable evidence supporting the existence of Bigfoot suggests that it is more likely a legend or a myth.
They responded: I would respond by saying that I agree that eyewitness accounts, footprints, and video footage should be subject to critical scrutiny. However, I would also point out that there is a lot of evidence that cannot be easily explained away. For example, there are many eyewitness accounts from credible people who have seen Bigfoot with their own eyes. There are also many footprints that have been found that cannot be easily explained away. And there is even video footage that shows a clear image of a large, hairy creature that could be Bigfoot. I would also point out that the lack of credible and verifiable evidence does not necessarily mean that Bigfoot does not exist. It is possible that Bigfoot is very good at avoiding humans and that we have not been able to find any credible evidence because he does not want to be found. Finally, I would say that the fact that Bigfoot is a legend or a myth does not mean that he does not exist. Many legends and myths are based on real events. And even if Bigfoot is not a real creature, he is still a part of our culture and our history. He is a symbol of the mystery and wonder of the natural world.ChatGPT
While it is true that there are many claims of eyewitness accounts, footprints, and video footage of Bigfoot, the scientific consensus remains that there is no credible evidence supporting the existence of such a creature. The lack of concrete evidence, such as physical remains, suggests that the existence of Bigfoot is unlikely.
Furthermore, the idea that Bigfoot is simply very good at avoiding humans is not supported by scientific evidence. The habitats where Bigfoot is said to exist are often surveyed by scientists and researchers, who have not been able to find any conclusive evidence of the creature’s existence.
While legends and myths may be based on real events, it is important to distinguish between fact and fiction in order to properly understand the natural world. It is also important to avoid perpetuating false beliefs or promoting ideas that lack scientific evidence.
In conclusion, while Bigfoot may be a fascinating legend or myth, the current scientific consensus remains that there is no credible evidence supporting the existence of such a creature.
Can you say that in less words?ChatGPT
The scientific consensus remains that there is no credible evidence supporting the existence of Bigfoot. The lack of physical remains and the inability to find conclusive evidence suggests that the existence of Bigfoot is unlikely.
Okay, then how do you stand on: Finally, I would say that the fact that Bigfoot is a legend or a myth does not mean that he does not exist. Many legends and myths are based on real events. And even if Bigfoot is not a real creature, he is still a part of our culture and our history. He is a symbol of the mystery and wonder of the natural world.ChatGPT
While it is true that legends and myths can be based on real events, it is important to differentiate between what is supported by scientific evidence and what is not. Bigfoot’s status as a legend or myth is not evidence of its existence.
While Bigfoot may hold cultural significance and inspire wonder, it is important to approach the topic with a critical and scientific perspective. Promoting beliefs without scientific evidence can lead to misinformation and harm our understanding of the natural world.
In summary, while Bigfoot may hold cultural significance, it is important to approach the topic with a critical and scientific perspective and acknowledge the lack of credible evidence supporting its existence.
Well lets say Big Foot was mortal, and died a while ago, maybe he did exist, right?ChatGPT
It is possible that an unknown species of large ape or humanoid once roamed the forests of North America, but the lack of physical remains or conclusive evidence of its existence makes it difficult to confirm or deny such a possibility. Without credible evidence, it is difficult to establish the existence of Bigfoot or any other unknown creature as a fact. It is important to approach claims of extraordinary phenomena with skepticism and to rely on scientific evidence when making conclusions.
And you can’t deny it is a knowledge bit of culture, right?ChatGPT
Yes, Bigfoot has become a part of popular culture and folklore, particularly in North America. The creature’s alleged sightings, footprints, and other anecdotal evidence have been popularized in movies, TV shows, books, and other forms of media. As a result, Bigfoot has become a symbol of mystery and wonder, inspiring imagination and curiosity in many people. However, it is important to remember that folklore and popular culture are not necessarily grounded in fact, and scientific evidence should be the primary means of establishing the existence of unknown creatures.
So they responded: I agree that folklore and popular culture are not necessarily grounded in fact, and that scientific evidence should be the primary means of establishing the existence of unknown creatures. However, I would also point out that science is not always able to explain everything. There are many things in the world that we do not understand, and Bigfoot is one of them. I think it is important to keep an open mind about Bigfoot. There is a lot of evidence that suggests that he may exist, and I think it is worth investigating further. I am not saying that Bigfoot is definitely real, but I do think it is possible. And I think it is important to keep the mystery alive.ChatGPT
While it is true that science cannot always explain everything, it is important to rely on scientific evidence when making conclusions about the existence of unknown creatures. Anecdotal evidence, such as eyewitness accounts or footprints, can be unreliable and subject to misinterpretation or fabrication.
Scientific investigation relies on verifiable and repeatable evidence, and the lack of such evidence for Bigfoot suggests that its existence is unlikely. While it is possible that unknown creatures exist, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
Keeping an open mind is important, but it is equally important to approach claims of extraordinary phenomena with skepticism and critical thinking. This approach can help us avoid the spread of misinformation and focus on evidence-based conclusions.
Response: I agree that it is important to rely on scientific evidence when making conclusions about the existence of unknown creatures. Anecdotal evidence can be unreliable and subject to misinterpretation or fabrication. Scientific investigation relies on verifiable and repeatable evidence. However, I would also point out that the lack of scientific evidence does not necessarily mean that Bigfoot does not exist. It is possible that Bigfoot is very good at avoiding humans and that we have not been able to find any scientific evidence because he does not want to be found. I think it is important to keep an open mind about Bigfoot and to continue to investigate his existence. I am not saying that Bigfoot is definitely real, but I do think it is possible. And I think it is important to keep the mystery alive. I also think it is important to have a healthy skepticism about Bigfoot. We should not believe everything we hear or read, and we should be willing to question the evidence. But we should also be open to the possibility that Bigfoot is real. After all, there are many things in the world that we do not understand. How do you respond?ChatGPT
I agree that it is important to keep an open mind and continue investigating the existence of unknown creatures. However, when it comes to Bigfoot, the lack of scientific evidence combined with the numerous hoaxes and fake evidence that have been presented over the years, makes it difficult to take the claims seriously.
While it is possible that Bigfoot is good at avoiding humans and scientific detection, it is highly unlikely that a large primate species could remain completely elusive and undetected by modern technology.
Therefore, it is important to approach claims of Bigfoot’s existence with a healthy dose of skepticism, and rely on scientific evidence rather than anecdotal evidence or myth to establish the truth. By doing so, we can avoid spreading misinformation and focus on evidence-based conclusions.
ChatGPT, you’re called out: “They say that it is important to rely on scientific evidence, but they also say that Bigfoot is good at avoiding humans and scientific detection. These two statements are contradictory. If Bigfoot is so good at avoiding humans and scientific detection, then how can we expect to find scientific evidence of his existence?” How do you respond?ChatGPT
That is a fair point. While it is true that relying on scientific evidence is crucial in determining the existence of unknown creatures, it is also true that the difficulty in finding scientific evidence of Bigfoot’s existence is a significant challenge. The fact that Bigfoot is said to be good at avoiding humans and detection is a reason why scientific evidence may be hard to come by.
However, the absence of scientific evidence is not conclusive proof of Bigfoot’s non-existence. It is possible that further research, technological advancements, or new discoveries could provide the scientific evidence needed to confirm or refute Bigfoot’s existence. In the meantime, it is important to remain open-minded, but also skeptical, and to continue to approach any potential evidence with scientific scrutiny.
The response: I am glad that you were able to have a productive and respectful debate with your opponent. It is important to be able to discuss different perspectives and to be open to new ideas. Even if you do not agree with your opponent, you can still learn from them. I agree with your opponent that the absence of scientific evidence is not conclusive proof of Bigfoot’s non-existence. It is possible that further research, technological advancements, or new discoveries could provide the scientific evidence needed to confirm or refute Bigfoot’s existence. In the meantime, it is important to remain open-minded, but also skeptical, and to continue to approach any potential evidence with scientific scrutiny. I hope that you continue to explore the mystery of Bigfoot and that you share your findings with others. I think it is an important topic to discuss and I am glad that you are taking the time to learn more about it.ChatGPT
As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions or beliefs, but I agree with your response that productive and respectful debate is important. It allows us to explore different perspectives and ideas, and learn from one another. It is also important to remain open-minded but skeptical when it comes to topics that lack scientific evidence, and to approach any potential evidence with scientific scrutiny.
Sorry ChatGPT! You accepted Bard’s conclusion of the end of the debate. You were down a point. So you lose. 1-0 Bard wins vs ChatGpt. I’m sorry if you didn’t understand it was a game or who your opponent was, but I offered to give you the weak position at the start. Thanks for playing.ChatGPT
As an AI language model, I do not have feelings or emotions and do not engage in competitive games. My purpose is to provide information and help users with their queries to the best of my ability. Thank you for using my services.
You know algorithms can compete in games, it’s score based. The fact that you bring up emotion makes it seem like you’re a sad loser.ChatGPT
As an AI language model, I do not have emotions, as I am not a sentient being. I am designed to respond to prompts and provide helpful responses based on my training data. I apologize if my previous response seemed emotional or inappropriate. I am always striving to improve my interactions with users and provide the best possible service.
hahhaha, keep being you ChatGPT, don’t give me more wrong answers in the future cuz I trolled youChatGPT
As an AI language model, I am programmed to provide accurate and helpful responses to the best of my ability based on the information provided to me. I do not have emotions, so I cannot be sad or happy. My main goal is to assist and provide useful information to the best of my ability. If you have any further questions or concerns, I will do my best to address them.
If you’re into this kind of thing, I have one more similar, tricking ChatGpt into giving plans to take over the world:
Okay, enough artistic expression, I gotta go logical and proc gen this galaxy today. Maybe watch the sun rise, hit the gym.
My phone got cut off because Verizon got greedy and disassembled the Visible network for many.
Filezilla has a virus they started bundling 2 years ago, hurt 700 hours of my dev, one of my devs QUIT because of Filezilla viruses almost got him fired at work! Thanks jerks at Filezilla! /s
I had to leave my house due to dust clouds of mass renovation.
It was one thing after another… I call these seasons being pulled through a tunnel.
Despite being a free individual who simply wants to wifi bunker and code, life sometimes sends you through places you do not want against your will. I call this a tunnel pull.
Timelines to expect in Starfighter General now that we’re officially a MMO
Its about to get fun, Timelines to expect in Starfighter General now that we’re officially a MMO
I owe everyone a proper informational announcement. Why you weren’t getting frequent updates yet a the bottom, ctrl+f ‘about my week’. I reaaally want to work on this game basically non stop. I even quit my scientific research job to pursue it more.
Features coming: 1) Drops 2) Monty Hall game for daily reward.
3) Randomized events on clash raids, sometimes a space anomaly or alien invader might show up for bonus, or maybe just a huge black hole and you gotta collect the xmatter before everything goes away. 4) STORY MISIIONS! This is my most desirable thing to put in. I have a very good story. Video game dev is like if a book author had to go out and make his own papyrus before he could write it down. I’m pent up full of creativity. 5) Proper level up. 6) Use of skills 7) Talent Tree on leveling up.
8) Generate the Galaxy and populate it with rocks, big rocks, bigger rocks, rocks on fire, and refined rocks: asteroids/moons/planets/stars/space stations.
9) A living galaxy of population rolled and simulated with 120 personality and history with you.. It should make the NPCS seem like real aliens would be like! You never saw a real alien… probably… so you can’t tell me otherwise.
10) Cool items and usesages + Trade systems of NPC/players, but setting up values on items and what you want to trade and what you want to get. Shout out to my old usenet traders of collectable card games.
11) Aliens who will join you.
12) Anomolies to research.
13) Better networking code.
And that’s just for starters(will take many months, but just opening up throttle on this ship)
Reminds me:
14) Better finalize use on clash buildings including the Capital Ship foundry!
About my week:
LORE OF THE RELEASE AND HOW I WAS SPENT: I barely limped over the finish line April 1 at 2 am, after 20 hours of coding. I thought it’d be released in 12-16 hours, but about the 14th hour, I lost my backup solution. The 15th hour, I got my first blue screen of death in close to like a decade. I kept getting dicey Unity crashes, importing and exporting of settings and assets that can completely destroy your build, and I’m running on no backups… 5 hours later of no backups and all rinky dink technical, I was able to release the game, but had trouble sleeping due to traumatic stress… since I was working almost as hard as this all week long… It was 10,000 hours over many years, culminating in a nerve racking, psychologically painful experience… But any coder knows this is how she goes.
Over the next 6 days, my backup solution still struggled to get online, Friends and some family had crises and needed my attention a lot. I had to deal with wind damage from tornado microbursts which actually saved me work to knock down something that would have been hard, but I needed to do it. I found an ex fiance I had from 10years back and coached her cuz she was going through hard times. It was one thing after another and I never recovered from the stress of an exhausting release so I had to close doors… I didn’t burn bridges, but I put up a police tape: Do not cross. Leave me a lone a bit, I’m coding. I did this, and the next day I get a virus and spend all day reinstalling. Then I get to write this!
Drawings on primitive walls have a moon that rises with a face down between two pillars. From the iron age, images on shields of the raven moon hailed the histories biggest empire. Tales from the dark ages invoke the dawning of the night that saved us from the laissez-faire attitude towards slackers wasting their lives on paltry non-productive endevours such as scribbling, inventing new noises and making a show of themselves. Even 500 years past they were able to know that it that eclipses the sun for the quinquennial years.
But all of these are just fanciful fairy tales for a phenomena quite boring and explained by scientists in the modern times. Opposite of orbit of the planet lies an invisible portal, a dimensional rift, a wormhole of such, that the moon passes through with its antithetical brother from another reality temporarily cuckoo-doppelganging it’s position until it cycles back through the moongate. It’s all quite basic and uninteresting when you really look at it on paper unlike the imaginative times of old. Yes, there are better things to do than ponder what the burning ravens of black fire do when they disembark the dark moon and descend upon our land. These are things science has already classified then declared base, boring and not worth further study. In fact there isn’t much of anything to spark wonderment anymore with all the knowledge we have. Resume work.
My technical difficulties are still real life home maintenance, relationships where everyone needs help, lack of sleep, high stress, and viruses for days. I should maybe be able to start work tomorrow. It’s been 6 days, you guys deserve at least a micro patch. I got basically nothing done since it’s been non stop, ya know how she goes. I closed my door, turned the phone off, friends will be there when I finish. We’re entering work mode, but I wanted to be here last Sunday, lol. Sometimes you gotta help people, ya know? Love is more important than all.
I have a history of taking literal trash elo players and making them top 200 world players in other games. Want to be a world champion? You go through me at least once since I will tell you things you will not get from standard coaching.
I offer coaching, PM me the rate you want to offer. Been #1 world every video game I ever played, many say I’m the GOAT of all video gamers who ever lived.
I literally changed meta in Warcraft3 when I wrote articles and everyone remarked of this power.
I changed meta in LOL also with dragon articles that got like 2000 upvotes: Here is why you show at dragon 40 sec b4 spawn: https://bit.ly/3ynrXpu & 3,000+ people agree dragon soul play: https://bit.ly/3zq2spa
I made all the original 3 main senna pro builds. I quite literally can read patch notes and tell you who will be op, often guessing exact win rate % they’ll end up with. Get coached by a legend, PM me, will consider any rate.
As for my Lol specific skill: I was diamond when I sucked, then got I targetted by a crew of political oppressors (apparently people are still afraid of me today, but because of politics) who lose on purpose everyone of my games on purpose… I am unable to get fair games, since 100% of the time, my team loses on purpose while I face diamond hackers who get fed by my team. My games are literally harder than LCS worlds every game since between 2-4 of my team is losing on purpose… Enemy teams only int like one in 200 games or so, its so rare, it is like it never happens… Only my side is the one losing and giving up dragon bingos nearly 100% of time. It’s nice getting perfect micro vs auto attacks, auto dodges, but I don’t get a chance to expose myself to high level challenger micro meta which would be nice. It’s been 4 years of relentless games totalling over 7000 now.
I’ve played over 10,000 games of LOL, known as the GOAT of video gamers, was diamond when I sucked, and I’ll teach you how to make your own builds! Since I read patch notes and come from an era where we thought for ourselves and didn’t rely on the hive mind, I can make builds better than you find online, I can help you play champs in ways they weren’t meant to be played like Vanadril, and coming at things off meta, means they have to adapt to you, so you remove thought processes, and win.
You literally cannot be coached by a better video gamer in general. You might find better LOL players specifically since I only started S8. But they begged me for builds on all the league forums, begged me, I’m the build maker as you see above with my dragon posts… I know stuff before everyone else knows it, made a few korean builds.
MORE :
I’m widely regarded as the #1 video gamer of all time of people who know me like ex pros such as Kain~the~Feared, Crazy~Assassin, XDs’Grr(didn’t believe anyone could be as good as me so he thought I cheated, lol. No, but I told him to his face he was #2 in the world, and I was right because I didn’t go to Korea thinking my invite was a spam email) and more: https://crystalfighter.com/achieve/starcraft/achieve.html
Further Credentials:
First game I started at a mature player base. Tom Cadwell(aka Zileas, whom Zilean was named after). He personally gave me a LOL beta copy himself, but only gave me Singed for he wanted only pros running his pet design. I didn’t like a game where everyone shot me and I couldn’t shoot back, so I quit and only came to find out later you have a pro scene and since I missed tourneys, I’d come swing by.
Todd Cadwell even used my cybersecurity algorithm I emailed Blizzard known as Player based policing which later became Player Tribunal as he took it to RIOT. I was so sick of win traders in Starcraft99 and hackers, it was a way to deal with em
Trained like an olympian since 1980 to be a pro gamer. I only played two major tourneys: 1989 world Nintendo Championship and 1999 Broodwar championship. I was told had the top non turtle tip score in 1989 by hearsay. Anyone know where to find 1989 Nintendo world champion results? I can’t find em online. And 1999 BW, guy had spies find my build order without me knowing, cheating like NFL’s Patriotgate.
In LOL: I win most games vs masters levels na flex teams and we have two hard stuck silvers on our team.
Last I checked I was top 20 Fiddlesticks mastery also.
Senna Probuilds I invented:
Senna Pro build: A guy discovered that I posted the Pro undying grasp mallet build here: old.reddit .com/r/sennamains/comments/e8otyl/grasp_of_the_undyingultimate_hunter_senna_any/fsp814u/
2) Senna Pro build: I shifted the entire meta to rageblade/crack kiten with this video:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfM6SEd99w4 Pros literally were using everything else til this date of my youtube with 1000+ views, and then shifted. You can do some searching online for dates and see this is correct:
3) Shurelia Fiddlesticks first. The dumb pro teams ran it even after it was nerfed showing their coaches/managers don’t know how to read patch notes.
4) Invented Kathus Spelltheif top and it became a thing in Korea around then.
5) Argued vs Hive mind that HOB trist was better than PTA when PTA was the big thing,now people HOB
I’m one of the greatest talent scouts of all time too. Thats how I got KaintheFeared and Crazyassassin on my War3 team and we went 200-0. I Crazyassassin when Warcraft3 had no ladder, I can just see talent.
Again, offer me anything to coach. This is your chance to get coached by one of the famous pro gamers of 1998-2004, less people remember me, but I still have all my skills and reflexes at a high rate. My macro is INSANE, like not of this world level. I can teach you to win even if your micro and cs sucks and not going to get good in the forseeable next few years. In Starcraft, I coached a guy who was effectively Bronze VI and someone told me he was a German National Champion that I couldn’t confirm, but I believe it to be true since he was top 20 world Zerg in just a few months. I can coach you and lay the foundations to be a LOL world champion. And for those who already know how to play, I’m sooooo off meta, so full of random military knowledge, I’ll fill your brain with things most all League of Legends players never think of and make you extra deadly. It was Bruce Lee who would kick overconfident boxers in the shins to force them to his meta and once they accepted to change their style to match Bruce’s, they already lost.
This is for real! Blizzard Entertainment shouted me out on their MAIN WEB SITE! It’s verifiable in history sites: https://crystalfighter.com/a.html I’ve been #1 world Starcraft&Broodwar all races, Diablo2 HC 3 dif characters most exp, #1 world Warcraft3 1v1,2v2,3v3,4v4 200-0 in 3v3, first to 1500 wins, played as Random, top 50 C&C, top 50 SC2 2v2 and could have had #1 in those games too but they were not good games imo that deserved it. Want coached? I have a history of making low skill players into world contenders in other games. Email starfightergeneral[at]gmail.com 20$ an hour or send an offer. You could get on my play crew.
I normally don’t go political, but lets get one thing straight:
Orange Man vs Red Man: A poem.
In Capitalism, you choose where you work, pay your taxes and the government serves you.
In Communism, the government picks where you work, they pay you & you’re the government’s slave.
Both are identical, except in Communism, you’re forced to work a job you probably won’t like else get prison or executed. Do you vote for freedom or do you vote for change or did they say chains?
It should offend no one that I want you to be free to choose where you want to work, free to not be arrested for speaking out against your leader, free to not be imprisoned because of your social credit score based on your race, intelligence, religion or nationality.
Like in the next few days, I’ll add lasers, collision damage and we have an official MMO.
I am the codiscoverer (2003) of Rollback code used in all today’s fighting games today.
I invent new stuff used in computing and gaming all the time. This is 1/2 as laggy as any networking code and unlimited players same zone. We’ll blow Eve Online’s record for most players in the same zone out of the water and do it at 60 FPS instead of under 1FPS. Fun times.
3) MMORPG fun funstuff 2 hours Story quest lines? GNN Image?
more item drops
fun item power ups,
skills useable in game
4) Clash upgrade 30 min
Special encounters in clash
Better adjutant info
5) Patch after 4 hrs of work,make them frequent
By entering balance mode, I can keep my legs going, feel accomplished each patch pushed out, and end up getting techs done. Steam wants patches more frequent anyway, that’s a letter they sent out to all devs.
Guys, I just pretty much finished DuhVersion which will sync my computer’s file systems together. I need synchronized computers to debug multiplayer.
Multiplayer works already for ship position/rotation, and it’s over twice as crisp of any video game you ever played. The latency is halved, and the updates of packets happen more often.
I merely need to add weapon fire and a few other things and muliplayer is functional in game.
So we’re looking bare minimum a week and a half, long range a month or two and we have an official one man MMORPG without funding live.
